What does twentysixtyseven mean to you?

Monday, December 20, 2004

Improve Recycling with RFID Tags

I think recyclable products should include RFID tags. Recycling plants would be so much more efficient. Consumers wouldn't need separate containers for normal trash and recycled trash. All the trash could go on a conveyor belt where a robot could pick out the recyclable products. The recyclable could easily be spilt into glass, paper, plastic, etc. Different types of plastics could be sorted quickly and with greater refining.

Tuesday, December 14, 2004

Google's hanging algorithm

Hanging algorithm? What the heck does that mean?

Well, I think Google has left a big hole in their searching algorithms for email and desktop searches. Now I'm a BIG fan of both services from Google. I can honestly say that they have changed my computing habits and make my day more efficient. However, there is a flaw.

One obvious flaw is the inability to link separate "conversations" in Gmail. If you start two different threads of emails with different subjects, Gmail will not let you combine them. I hope there will be an option for this in the future. But even if that was the case, it may be annoying to manually "join" all of your conversations.

So what happens if you have a few emails (or Word Documents) talking about your trip to Cancun, the people you are going with, the time you are leaving, the hotel you are staying at, and a short itinerary. Not all of these emails or documents may have the word "Cancun" in them. So how do you search all of them? Well, some objects have the name of people, some objects have travel dates, and other objects may simply be referenced in multiple threads.

Wouldn't you like the capability to search for the word "Cancun" and have Gmail or Google Desktop Search (GDS) know that your 15 emails with the word "Cancun" may also have:
- Some of he same 10 people in common
- some of the same travel dates
- some of the same items mentioned (suntan lotion, rum, hot chics, etc.)

Google should create a whole algorithm based on "relevance " via a networked mesh of terms. (Think of Friendster and searching for your friend "Todd" and having it return Todd and all of his friends.) Maybe this hotel itinerary email doesn't actually mention the word Cancun, but it says Mexico and has some travel dates in common with your Airline itinerary to Cancun. All of these objects could come up in your search. No need for you to assign categories to emails. An entire "relevance" thread can be created, bringing in much more information then was previously searchable. Without this suggested method, a human is required to do these "network mesh" calculations and guess what other words should be searched to find relevant information.

Share Everything!

Earlier this year, the day after Halloween, my girlfriend, her dog, and I attended a pet costume dog show down in the East Village. There were hundreds of people and hundreds of dogs, almost all in costume. Many photographers, both amateur and professional, were snapping pictures. That night, when trying to remember the website of one photographer, I pondered about an idea:

If my cell phone had it's location logged via GPS (or cell towers) and there was some service (ala Friendster) that could comb though the millions of daily logs and place you on a time/location map with individuals that you appeared to have been in contact with for a few minutes, you could create a dynamic network of physical social interactions.

Now I know there have been plans in the works for cell phone based social networks for sometime. For example, you step into a bar in the middle of some little town on the southern tip of Germany and suddenly your phone starts vibrating because somebody you took a class with back in college is sitting at the end of the bar. Now this is an excellent idea, but I'm thinking of taking it a few steps further. This is where my "Share Everything" campaign comes in.

I'll outline an alternative solution to my Halloween example and show where it fails. For instance, the professional photographer could have simply handed out business cards to dog owners that he took a picture of. He could have used this to maybe attract individuals to his site and maybe even make some money off of advertising or charging for photos. Either way, he would have had to give me a physical item, i.e. the business card. Another solution may have involved beaming a website from his cell phone to my cell phone in order to remind me to visit his website the next time I was in front of a computer. Now this would be a pretty efficient method, but to me, it is still limited. For one thing, what if I decided at the time not to accept his cell phone beam (It could have been spam for all I know.) Now that transaction is lost in time, and very difficult to recover. Or maybe I was talking to another dog owner who snapped a pic of my dog, but we decided there was no need to exchange info. But let's say a month letter, the photo gets placed in some magazine and he wants to add the owner's info, he can't, that transaction was lost.

Now we turn to my "Share Everything" campaign. Yes, as a privacy advocate, I know this is a difficult concept to swallow. But forgot that for a minute, who knows how the future will change our perceptions.

If their was a transactional log, this is where I coin the term "XOG" pronounced "zog" Derived from "TRANSaction", X and "log", OG. If this XOG was able to record all of your daily transactional activities along with everyone else's transactional activities, and a good percentage of these folk allowed their activity to be shared with individuals that appeared to be in the same physical location at the same time; a new world of information sharing could be had. Maybe you're walking though Washington Square Park and somebody snaps a picture with your big head covering half of the Washington Arch. Wouldn't it be fun to have some website throw that photo in your Inbox? Only if the photo taker agreed of course. Maybe you are hanging out at some party up in Spanish Harlem and you meet some chill cats, wouldn't it be cool to log in, check out who you were talking to, and send them a note?

We are living in a society where the amount of information being shared is enormous. Kids are walking around with library's full of information in the palm of their hands. The amount of information we carry and share will keep growing, we will always face a problem on how to organize and store it. Why let physical transactions get in the away. Avoid the issue of physically transferring information from one individual to another. By using a service like I've mentioned above, we will not be required to physically transfer information from one individual to another. Information will be automatically recorded and shared, no work on your part, lazy boy.

Friday, December 03, 2004

Career Aspirations

Yesterday, my manager/coach asked what were my career goals in order to justify my choice of Extreme Blue. "What are my career goals?" he asked.

Well, there is no one ultimate career I would like to end up in, nor a profession. However, what I do know is this:

- I want to enjoy what I'm doing.
- I want to have a broad range of experiences, across lifestyles, cultures, education, work experience, etc.
- I want to continue learning, forever.
- I want to change my career path a few times over my lifetime
- I would rather make this world better then merely just generate revenue (I would rather do both.)
- I want to be creative and inventive.

So I don't have a "profession" that I can name off, and from my list of aspirations, there does not seem to be any one posistion to fit these goals. So in response to "What are my career goals?" I would have to list the above items as guides on my path, they will take me wherever I need to go.

Thursday, December 02, 2004

Extreme Blue Interview

So I had my Extreme Blue (EB) phone interview with Kevin this morning. I think it went pretty well. I think all of my answers where along the lines of what he was looking for. I may have sounded a little nervous or stuttered a few too many times, but that should be the only thing going against me. Hopefully I'm accepted to the program, it would be totally cool. I may find out as early as next week (early Dec.).

I still can't believe how much kickback I'm getting from my managers about this opportunity. They constantly question "How will this help my career?" Well as Kevin said, those who understand the program don't need to ask that question, those who don't understand the program always ask that question.

Wish me luck on two fronts. I have my EB decision hanging in the wind and an upcoming LSAT on Saturday.

Will the LSAT be a waste of my time? Wait a year to find out.